Skip to main content
Save the MBR Beagles
The MarchHow to Help
Campaign
TimelineUpdates
The Case
Evidence & FactsThe TrialsThe Bleeding LicenceGreen Hill PrecedentGallery
The Law
Legal FrameworkSection 58 ChallengeEstablishment LicenceProtest Laws & Judicial Review
The Movement
Campaign UpdatesMarshall BioResourcesRidglan Solidarity (USA)Save the Dogs USA
Account
Sign UpSign In
Their page. Our reply.

MBR National Security: The Multinational Warning About Overseas Labs

Marshall BioResources has a page arguing that ending animal research in America would not end it, only move it to countries with weaker protections, and that domestic capacity is a matter of national security. Marshall breeds animals in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China and Japan. It owns MBR Acres in Wyton, Cambridgeshire and B&K Universal near Hull. The company warning that research might go overseas is the company that took it there. Here is the other side, on both sides of the Atlantic.

Last updated Sources

5
countries where Marshall breeds animals for laboratories
10
dogs hands-on examined per USDA inspection, whatever the site size
12 mo
prison for “interfering” with MBR Acres under the 2026 KNI rules
£2.1m+
Cambridgeshire Police spend on the MBR Acres protest since 2021

What Marshall’s page says

In our words, not theirs. The original is on marshallbio.com.

  • Newer methods are advancing, but animal research remains integral to how medicines are approved.
  • Abruptly ending US animal research would disrupt the biomedical pipeline: vaccines, biologics, military medicine, pandemic countermeasures.
  • US animal research runs under some of the world’s most rigorous rules: the Animal Welfare Act, USDA inspection, institutional committees, AAALAC accreditation, the 3Rs.
  • The work would not disappear; it would move to countries with less oversight and less accountability, and worse data.
  • China already supplies a large share of the ingredients in US generic drugs and is expanding into preclinical testing.
  • The responsible path is to keep investing in alternatives without weakening domestic capacity first.

01Who is offshoring animal research?

Their own numbers
Marshall says

If the US gives up its capacity, research will relocate to countries with significantly weaker protections.

The other side

Marshall is the relocation.

Marshall BioResources is not a New York farm with a national interest at stake. It is a multinational with breeding operations in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China and Japan. In the UK it owns MBR Acres, which breeds around 2,000 beagles a year at Wyton, and B&K Universal near Hull. Its Italian breeder, Green Hill, was seized by the authorities in 2012 after 6,023 dogs died there. A company that already breeds laboratory animals on three continents, including in the country its page names as the risk, is not warning you about offshoring. It is describing its own business model. See the whole group.

02Are US standards really “among the world’s most rigorous”?

Regulator record
Marshall says

The Animal Welfare Act, USDA inspection, institutional oversight committees, AAALAC accreditation and the 3Rs make US animal research exceptionally well regulated.

The other side

This is the regime that produced Marshall’s own record.

USDA guidance caps hands-on dog examinations at 10 animals per inspection, however large the site. At Marshall’s biggest facility, with more than 14,000 dogs, that is roughly one dog in 1,500. Two inspectors led 46 of the 48 public inspections of Marshall between 2014 and 2026, and inspections with extra inspectors recorded violations more than twice as often as those led by the usual pair. Even so, the USDA has cited Marshall for more than 20 Animal Welfare Act violations since 2007, and on 28 June 2023 issued Marshall Farms Group an Official Warning (ref NY230026) over cat housing.

AAALAC is a private, industry-funded accreditation, not a regulator. And the “rigorous” US regime is the same one under which Envigo’s Cumberland, Virginia site was shut down in 2022 with around 4,000 beagles removed, its parent Inotiv later pleading guilty to a record Animal Welfare Act penalty, and under which Ridglan Farms surrendered its breeding licence in April 2026 after a Wisconsin court found probable cause of felony animal cruelty. Marshall is right that these are separate companies. They were regulated by the standards it is asking you to trust.

03How does the “national security” argument look from the UK?

Public record
Marshall says

Domestic animal research infrastructure is a matter of national security.

The other side

In Britain, the security language has already been used. Against protesters.

In the UK

Since 11 February 2026, MBR Acres has been treated as “key national infrastructure” under the Public Order Act 2023, so “interfering” with a beagle breeder carries up to 12 months in prison and an unlimited fine. The first arrests under that law came on 24 February 2026. A High Court judicial review of the regulations, arguing they breach the rights to free expression and peaceful assembly (ECHR Articles 10 and 11), was filed on 2 March 2026. At the Westminster Hall debate on 27 April 2026 the local MP said the legislation had been introduced for no reason other than to address Camp Beagle. Cambridgeshire Police have spent more than £2.1 million policing peaceful protest at the site since 2021. Marshall has also taken campaigners to the High Court for injunctions (including MBR Acres v Curtin [2025] EWHC 331). The protest laws, explained.

In the UK

Meanwhile the UK government’s own position is the opposite of Marshall’s. Its November 2025 strategy, “Replacing animals in science”, commits to eliminating animal use “in all but exceptional circumstances” and prioritises replacement for dogs. Britain does not treat a dog-breeding shed as strategic capacity. It treats it as something to phase out.

04Would ending dog breeding weaken vaccines, military medicine or pandemic readiness?

Follow the dogs
Marshall says

Sudden cessation would affect vaccines, biologics, military medicine and infectious-disease countermeasures.

The other side

Marshall’s own FAQ says it does not carry out research. It breeds and sells. So the question is where its animals go, and the answer is not a vaccine line. In August 2026 White Coat Waste Project traced Marshall dogs and cats to NIH-funded experiments including induced heart failure, obesity and diabetes, circulatory arrest, spinal cord injury and skull drilling. In the UK, MBR Acres beagles are sold at around sixteen weeks to contract research organisations for regulatory toxicity testing. Since December 2022 US law has not required animal tests before human trials at all. A readiness argument for beagle breeding has to explain what the beagles are for, and this page does not try.

05What about China and the drug supply chain?

Context
Marshall says

China supplies a large share of the ingredients in US generic drugs and is expanding into preclinical testing, so the US must keep its own capacity.

The other side

The figures Marshall cites are about active pharmaceutical ingredients and biotech licensing deals. They are not about dogs. Nothing in the share of antibiotics or vitamins sourced from China changes whether a beagle toxicity study predicts what a drug will do in a person, which is the question the 9-in-10 clinical failure rate answers. And Marshall operates breeding facilities in China. If the concern is Chinese preclinical capacity, the company raising it is one of the companies building it. The supply-chain paragraph is a security argument borrowed from a different debate to make a dog-breeding business look like a strategic asset.

06What is “a responsible path forward”?

No reply
Marshall says

Keep investing in validated alternatives, but avoid abrupt policy changes that weaken research capacity before they are ready.

The other side

We proposed exactly that. Marshall did not answer.

On 20 June 2026 we sent MBR Acres, its parent companies, its customers and the Cambridgeshire authorities an open letter proposing a negotiated, peaceful closure of the Wyton site, including an offer to buy the remaining dogs, with four weeks for a substantive reply. The deadline passed at midday on 19 July 2026 without a response. When Ridglan Farms in Wisconsin agreed to close in 2026, more than 2,000 beagles went to rescue and research did not collapse. More than 65 companies have already cut ties with MBR Acres. A planned transition is on the table. It is Marshall that has declined to sit at it.

Five countries. Three continents. One warning about going overseas.

Marshall’s page asks you to see a dog-breeding business as a strategic asset. Look at where the company already operates, what its inspection record says, and what the dogs are sold for. Then do one of three things.